Why Pahlavi is not an option
Reza Pahlavi is not a credible option for Iran’s future because he lacks political experience, offers no concrete roadmap for democratic transition, and relies on symbolism rather than institution-building. He does not support inclusive politics for Iran’s diverse ethnic communities, insisting on a rigid “one nation” narrative that denies plural national identities and risks reproducing exclusion and repression. He has also consistently avoided critically confronting or challenging his father’s policies toward Kurds, Turks, Lurs, and other marginalized groups, which raises serious concerns about accountability and historical honesty. He appears disconnected from the realities of working-class life and everyday economic struggle, speaking from privilege rather than lived experience. His surrounding circle is often divisive and hostile toward other opposition voices, undermining democratic norms, and his inconsistent stance on Women, Life, Freedom has weakened trust among women, the backbone of Iran’s resistance. Moreover, his political fragility makes him vulnerable to becoming a proxy for larger foreign powers rather than an independent, accountable leader—precisely what Iran cannot afford.
